Talk:Jews for Jesus
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Jews for Jesus article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9Auto-archiving period: 6 months ![]() |
![]() | The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
![]() | Please stay calm and civil while commenting or presenting evidence, and do not make personal attacks. Be patient when approaching solutions to any issues. If consensus is not reached, other solutions exist to draw attention and ensure that more editors mediate or comment on the dispute. |
![]() | This page is not a forum for general discussion about Jews for Jesus. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Jews for Jesus at the Reference desk. |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 180 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
Major changes - most not good
[edit]The large changes, dropping lots of accepted information and adding a lot of propaganda need to be discussed on the talk page. Most of this article is not acceptable as is at the moment. The point of this article should not be as a propaganda piece for Jews for Jesus, and you can not leave out criticisms. Many of the changes are to things that have been discussed over many years to come to a consensus. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Laella (talk • contribs) 18:41, 4 May 2020 (UTC) I agree, this should be a protected page. Too much promotional and biased editing. Yoleaux (talk) 20:45, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
No balance of information on this page
[edit]Scanning through the page, I was surprised at the bias against this organization. I know it is a controversial topic, but this clearly violates Wikipedia’s neutrality standards. There should be a balance of information. Because of that, I’ve added a couple relevant quotes to the article to help restore some of that balance. I have also removed/edited a couple statements that have logical fallacies, which I will explain in detail below:
- Removing The Evangelical Lutheran Church in America from the list of those criticizing evangelism of Jews: The referenced doctrine doesn’t actually say the church criticizes Jewish evangelism. It only says to be aware that most Jews believe Messianic Jews and Jews for Jesus have “forsaken Judaism, and consider efforts to maintain otherwise to be deceptive,” which is not them criticizing Jewish evangelism. I did some further research and couldn’t find any other statement from them criticizing the evangelism of Jews.
- Removing Rabbi Irving Greenberg’s quote on Jews for Jesus and supersessionism: The quote of Rabbi Irving Greenberg accusing Jews for Jesus of teaching Christian supersessionism contains major factual errors. In reality, Messianic Judaism has publicly denounced the idea of supersessionism, and Jews for Jesus has as well. I found several sources that confirm this, which I can list if need be. Since his statement mostly contains false information, it should be removed.
If anyone disagrees with any of the changes I made, before undoing my changes, please respond to me on the talk page and let’s discuss this. I intend to be very responsive on this page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AEditing3 (talk • contribs) 01:39, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
- I agree that this article suffers from severe bias against Jews for Jesus. The introduction to the article is pretty much a hit piece on the organization. There are two fundamental problems with the introduction to the article: (1) It completely ignores the meaning of Jew as an ethnicity, not a religion, and (2) It ignores the fact that all the original followers of Jesus were ethnically Jews and also considered themselves to be of the Jewish faith. They did not see themselves as having abandoned Judaism by following Jesus. First century Judaism was a very diverse faith, with the Pharisees, Sadducees, Essenes, and the followers of the Jesus movement. In this context, the followers of Jesus were not any more out of line with Judaism than the Essenes. It was not until the destruction of the temple in 70 AD that the Sadducees and Essenes disappeared, and the majority of followers of Jesus came to think of themselves as Christians, separate from Judaism. Pharisaic Judaism was the only surviving Judaism after the destruction of the temple, and it evolved into the Rabbinic Judaism that we know today. Westwind273 (talk) 05:34, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
Better Business Bureau
[edit]@Intercalate I removed the information about the Better Business Bureau because it included a large chunk of what is a standard BBB message when a charity does not interact with it. A lot of churches do not seek BBB approval. They might use a different group like Candid (organization) (aka GuideStar) or Charity Navigator. Jews for Jesus might well be problematic as far as finances; however, Wikipedia needs a reliable source stating this. Note the BBB also states in a section not quoted: "It[this report] is not intended to recommend or deprecate". Is there a reason you want to include this in the entry? Erp (talk) 04:30, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
Jews for Jesus and the Ebionites
[edit]A lot of the statements in this article directly contradict the Wikipedia article on the Ebionites. After all, if it is impossible to be a Jew who believes in the divinity of Jesus, then who were the Ebionites? Weren't they exactly that? This article reeks of Jew vs Christian bigotry, similar to what caused the cancellation of the popular TV show "Bridget Loves Bernie" in the 1970's. This bigotry has a long history in the United States, and it is disappointing to see it continued in this article. Westwind273 (talk) 14:47, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
The Cross of Christ
[edit]Replace or add the Cross symbol to your title name "Jews f✡️r Jesus✝️". 99.179.126.247 (talk) 13:29, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
- It is their logo so you need to take it up with the group directly not wikipedia. Erp (talk) 16:03, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
- Wikipedia controversial topics
- B-Class Religion articles
- Low-importance Religion articles
- WikiProject Religion articles
- B-Class Christianity articles
- Mid-importance Christianity articles
- B-Class Jewish Christianity articles
- High-importance Jewish Christianity articles
- WikiProject Jewish Christianity articles
- WikiProject Christianity articles
- Talk pages of subject pages with paid contributions